Dupr 2008 Round One Washup
#1
Posted 01 April 2008 - 01:42 PM
Phil
#2
Posted 01 April 2008 - 02:42 PM
hat coat Im outa here.
cheers
rick1776
rick1776
#3
Posted 01 April 2008 - 03:24 PM
I need all the help I can get!
Don't want to give Phil any more of an advantage.
Terry
#4
Posted 01 April 2008 - 04:12 PM

#5
Posted 01 April 2008 - 04:29 PM
Greg
#6
Posted 02 April 2008 - 06:11 AM
There were some cars that sounded like they needed a drop or two of oil aswell.
So far we have.
WD-40 treatment please!
Smallnails
Kelbfellp
terry
mopardevil
NO tyre treatment please!
espsix
Maybe this list needs to be printed out, and sent off with the cars to each round?
Edited by espsix, 02 April 2008 - 06:13 AM.
#7
Posted 02 April 2008 - 06:38 AM
espsix, on Apr 2 2008, 07:11 AM, said:
There were some cars that sounded like they needed a drop or two of oil aswell.
So far we have.
WD-40 treatment please!
Smallnails
Kelbfellp
terry
mopardevil
NO tyre treatment please!
espsix
Maybe this list needs to be printed out, and sent off with the cars to each round?
Wild Turkey
Ontheflipside
When I stop to think I forget to start again
Mount Salt Panorama Track Combined Road and Rally Track near Salt Pan Creek Padstow - Sydney
A quick build rally track
2010/2011 Ozrally Proxy at Mt SaltPanorama

#8
Posted 02 April 2008 - 06:57 AM
David
4 x Aus National Champion...
Premier Raceway Build
Gallery Raceway Build.
Heany Park Raceway Build
#9
Posted 02 April 2008 - 07:39 AM
Davnic74, on Apr 2 2008, 07:57 AM, said:
Dave WD-40 conditions up tyres such as NSR, plus all the "standard" (rubber based) tyres from Scaley, Fly, Ninco, etc.
But is no good for (Urethane based) tyres such as MJK's.
Most noticable on plastic tracks, instant grip, but has to be reapplied all the time.
#10
Posted 02 April 2008 - 08:20 AM
espsix, on Apr 2 2008, 08:39 AM, said:
Davnic74, on Apr 2 2008, 07:57 AM, said:
Dave WD-40 conditions up tyres such as NSR, plus all the "standard" (rubber based) tyres from Scaley, Fly, Ninco, etc.
But is no good for (Urethane based) tyres such as MJK's.
Most noticable on plastic tracks, instant grip, but has to be reapplied all the time.
But that mean's it will dis-advantage the car's with MJK's such as your's because of residue left on the surface?
David
4 x Aus National Champion...
Premier Raceway Build
Gallery Raceway Build.
Heany Park Raceway Build
#11
Posted 02 April 2008 - 08:43 AM
#12
Posted 02 April 2008 - 08:49 AM
Quote
But that mean's it will dis-advantage the car's with MJK's such as your's because of residue left on the surface?
Your right, but what do you do?
Maybe, all the cars that don't want any WD-40 on their tyres should be run first up at each round, that way neither group of cars are dis-advantaged?
Quote
Edited by espsix, 02 April 2008 - 08:50 AM.
#13
Posted 02 April 2008 - 08:58 AM
Seem's to be bit of a waste of time to get only 2 tenth's off 2-3 lap's and then the car maybe lose's more by race end
I noticed at the National's most were using shellite to clean tyre's maybe this is a better option! because after all you just want your tyre's cleaned right?
Edited by Davnic74, 02 April 2008 - 09:15 AM.
David
4 x Aus National Champion...
Premier Raceway Build
Gallery Raceway Build.
Heany Park Raceway Build
#14
Posted 02 April 2008 - 09:55 AM
it will certainly cause problems as some track owners refuse to allow any artificial fluids to be used on thier tracks.apart from cleaning with water eg damp rag.
Edited by oldslot, 02 April 2008 - 10:03 AM.
#15
Posted 02 April 2008 - 11:46 AM
Quote
This has never been the case,the cleaning has been left to the track owners "house rules"
If this is to be a new regulation then all entrants should be allowed to change tyres with no penalty.
Shellite is an option but does tend to dry some tyres out. I also think it is no good on MLK's.
IMO this should be left to the track owners to decide.and do what their normal procedure is after all they know their tarck surface better than anyone.
If the guys with ferrodore do not want to clean the tyres then that is O/K, but the guys with other surfaces should be able to.
Phil
#16
Posted 02 April 2008 - 12:07 PM
As i said before, if the use of tyre treatments is allowed, why not clean the track off, run the MJK/Ortman shod cars, then run the WD-40 bunch?
Which ever way it goes, no penalty should apply to tyre changes!
Edited by espsix, 02 April 2008 - 12:08 PM.
#17
Posted 02 April 2008 - 12:10 PM
Davnic74, on Apr 2 2008, 09:58 AM, said:
Seem's to be bit of a waste of time to get only 2 tenth's off 2-3 lap's and then the car maybe lose's more by race end
I noticed at the National's most were using shellite to clean tyre's maybe this is a better option! because after all you just want your tyre's cleaned right?
Dave, shelite would of been used to clean the "goo" off the tyres more than a treatment, and would only dry out most tyres we are using.
#18
Posted 02 April 2008 - 12:11 PM
Having driven his track alot, I think we will have a totally different result to round one anyway. It will suit those cars that run well on a fast flowing track.
#19
Posted 02 April 2008 - 12:45 PM
If I had known I could have been at a disadvantage because the track may be coated with a residue I would have selected a different tyre. (sponge with goo maybe)
Cleaning can be done with a bit of whatever fluid you like but use a rag to clean and wipe any dirt off the tyre. Don't just put it on the track and leave a slick trail behind . I can't remember anything before the start when all the posts were going up about the proxy that said any tyre and any traction fluids allowed ? Im for keeping the track totally clean .
Seems like the 2008 rules are being bent a lot . Motor swaps and tyre swaps after 75% of the cars were delivered on the due date. Extra fine tuning being done after the due date . And magnetic downforce from open can motors is still another issue that slipped by. It all seems a bit odd at times , whatever happens happens , its not cattle stations but it doesn.t look all cosher either.
#20
Posted 02 April 2008 - 12:59 PM
Quote
Are the cars that were late going to get some sort of penalty?
Phil
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













